Dimensiones de valor pluralistas de los servicios ecosistémicos como una oportunidad hacia la transdisciplina
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Detalles del artículo
Arias-Arévalo, P., Martín-López, B. y Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2017). Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 22(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26799016
Benra, F. y Nahuelhual, L. (2019). A trilogy of inequalities: Land ownership, forest cover and ecosystem services distribution. Land Use Policy, 82, 247-257.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.020
Berbés-Blázquez, M., González, J. y Pascual, U. (2016). Towards an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 19, 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.02.003
Bidegain, I, Cerda, C., Tironi, A. y López-Santiago, C. (2019). Social preferences for ecosystem services in a biodiversity hotspot in South America. Plos One, 14(4), e0215715. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215715.
Bremer, L., Brauman, KA., Nelson, S., Meza Prado, K., Wilburn, E. y Fiorini, ACO. (2018). Relational values in evaluations of upstream social outcomes of watershed Payment for Ecosystem Services: A review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.024
Brewer, GD. y Stern, PC. (Eds.). (2005). Decision Making for the Environment:Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11186
Cerda, C. y Tironi, A. (2017). La evaluación no monetaria de los servicios ecosistémicos: Perspectivas para la gestión del territorio. Revista Luna Azul, 45, 329-352.
Cerda C. y Bidegain, I. (2018). Spectrum of concepts associated with the term Biodiversity: a case study in a biodiversity hotspot in South America. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 190, 207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6588-4.
Chan, K MA., Satterfield, T. y Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking Ecosystem Services to Better Address and Navigate Cultural Values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G. W., Martín-López, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki,
M., Taggart, J. y Turner, N. (2016). Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(6), 1462-1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113
Chapman, M., Satterfield, T. y Chan, KMA. (2019). When value conflicts are barriers: can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs? Land use Policy, 82, 464-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.017
Chaudhary, S., McGregor, A., Houston, D. y Chettri, N. (2018). Environmental justice and ecosystem services: A disaggregated analysis of community access to forest benefits in Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 29, 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.020
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S. y Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
De Clerck, F., Ingram, JC. y Rumbaitis del Rio, CM. (2006). The role of ecological theory and practice in poverty alleviation and environmental conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 533-540. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295 (2006)4[533:TROETA]2.0.CO;2
De Groot, R., Brander, L., Der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F. y Braat, L. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005
Delgado, L. y Marin, V. (2019). Socioecological systems of Latin America: Complexities and challenges. Springer.
De Vos, A., Bezerra, JC. y Roux, D. (2018). Relational values about nature in protected area research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.018
Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polasky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., ... Shirayama, Y. (2018). Assessingnature’s contributions to people. Science, 359(6373), 270–272. https://doi.
org/10.1126/science.aap8826
Erwin, A., Ma, Z., Popovici, R., Salas O’Brien, E. P., Zanotti, L., Zeballos Zeballos, E., Bauchet, J., Ramirez Calderón, N. y Arce Larrea, G. R. (2021). Intersectionality shapes adaptation to social-ecological change. World Development, 138, 105282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105282
Fisher, B., Turner, RK. y Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
Gomez-Baggethun, E., Martín-Lopez, B., Barton, D., Braat, L., Saarikoski, H., Kelemen, E., García-Llorente, M., van den Bergh, J., Arias, P., Berry, P., Potschin, M., Keene, H., Dunford, R., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Harrison, P., 2014 State-of-the-art report on integrated valuation of ecosystem services, EU OpenNESS
Project Deliverable 4.1, European Commission FP7.
Gómez-Betancur, L., Vilardy, SP. y Torres, R. (2021). Ecosystem Services as a Promising Paradigm to Protect Environmental Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Latin America: the Constitutional Court Landmark Decision to Protect Arroyo Bruno in Colombia. Environmental Management, 69, 768-780; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01483-w
Gould, RK., Pai, M., Muraca, B. y Chan, KMA. (2019). He ‘ike ‘ana ia i ka pono (it is a recognizing of the right thing): how one indigenous worldview informs relational values and social values. Sustainability, 14, 1213–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00721-9
Himes, A. y Muraca, B. (2018). Relational values: the key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005
IPBES, (2020). Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Daszak,P., das Neves, C., Amuasi, J., Hayman, D., Kuiken, T., Roche, B., Zambrana-Torrelio, C., Buss, P., Dundarova, H., Feferholtz, Y., Foldvari, G., Igbinosa, E., Junglen, S., Liu, Q., Suzan, G., Uhart, M., Wannous, C., Woolaston, K., Mosig Reidl, P., O’Brien, K., Pascual, U., Stoett, P., Li, H., Ngo, H. T., IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4158500
IPBES (2022). Summary for Policymakers of the Methodological Assessment Report on the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Christie, M., Baptiste, B., González-Jiménez, D., Anderson,
C.B., Athayde, S., Barton, D.N., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Jacobs, S., Kelemen, E., Kumar, R., Lazos, E., Martin, A., Mwampamba, T.H., Nakangu, B., O’Farrell, P., Raymond, C.M., Subramanian, S.M., Termansen, M., Van Noordwijk, M., and Vatn, A. (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6522392
Jax, K., Calestani, M., Chan, KMA., Eser, U., Keune, H., Muraca, B. y Brien, LO. (2018). Caring for nature matters: a relational approach for understanding nature’s contributions to human well-being. Current Opinion of Environmental Sustainability, 35, 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009
Jones, NA., Shaw, S., Ross, H., Witt, K. y Pinner, B. (2016). The study of human values in understanding and managing socio-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 21(1), 15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26270349
López-Santiago, C. A., Oteros-Rozas, E., Martín-López, B., Plieninger, T., Martín, E. G. y A. González, J. (2014). Using visual stimuli to explore the social perceptions of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes: the case of transhumance in Mediterranean Spain. Ecology and Society, 19(2). http://www.jstor.org/stable/26269539
Maes, J., Burkhard, B. y Geneletti, D. (2018). Ecosystem services are inclusive and deliver multiple values. A comment on the concept of nature’s contributions to people. One Ecosystem, 3, e24720. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24720
Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Amo, D. G. D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., González, J. A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M.,
López-Santiago, C. y Montes, C. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE, 7(6), Artículo e38970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.
Nahuelhual, L., Saavedra, G., Henríquez, F., Benra, F., Vergara, X., Perugache, C. y Hasen, F. (2018). Opportunities and limits to ecosystem services governance in developing countries and indigenous territories: The case of water supply in Southern Chile. Environmental Science & Policy, 86, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.012
Ocampo-Melgar, A., Lutz-Ley, A., Zúñiga, A., Cerda, C. y Goirán, S. (2022). Zonas áridas de Latinoamérica: Desafíos y oportunidades para un desarrollo sostenible. Metode Science Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.13.21458
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of socialecological systems. Science, 325. 419-422. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20536694
Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R. T., Başak Dessane, E., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., Maris, V., Quaas, M., Subramanian, S. M., Wittmer, H., Adlan, A., Ahn, S., Al-Hafedh, Y. S., Amankwah, E., Asah, S. T., ... Yagi, N. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 7–16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
Paavola, J. y Hubacek, K. (2013). Ecosystem services, governance, and stakeholder participation: An introduction. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269381
Razeto, J., Skewes, JC. y Catalán, E. (2019). Prácticas de Conservación, Sistemas Naturales y Procesos Culturales: Apuntes Para Una Reflexión Crítica Desde La Etnografía. En C. Cerda, E. Silva-Rodríguez y C. Briceño (Eds.), Naturaleza En Sociedad. Una Mirada a La Dimensión Humana de La Conservación de La Biodiversidad. (pp. 125-157). Ocho Libros.
Redford, K H. y Adams, WM. (2009). Payment for Ecosystem Services and the Challenge of Saving Nature. Conservation Biology, 23(4), 785-787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01271.x
Reyers, B., O’Farrell, P J., Cowling, R M., Egoh, B N., Le Maitre, D C. y Vlok, J H J. (2009). Ecosystem Services, Land-Cover Change, and Stakeholders: Finding a Sustainable Foothold for a Semiarid Biodiversity Hotspot. Ecology and Society, 14(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268036
Reyers, B., Folke, C., Lee Moore, M., Biggs, R. y Galaz, V. (2018). Social-Ecological Systems Insights for Navigating the Dynamics of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 267–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085349
Riechers, M., Balazsi, A., Betz, L., Jiren, T. y Fischer, J. (2020). The erosion of relational values resulting from landscape simplification. Landscape Ecology, 35, 2601-2612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01012-w
Sangha, KK., Preece, L., Villarreal, J., Kegamba, JJ., Warmenhoven, T. y Krishnan, PS. (2018). An ecosystem services framework to evaluate indigenous and local peoples’ connections with nature. Ecosystem Services, 31(A), 115-125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.017
Scholte, S., Van Teeffelen, A. y Verburg, P. (2015). Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods. Ecological Economics, 114, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007
Schröter, M., Başak, E., Christie, M., Church, A., Keune, H., Osipova, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Sievers-Glotzbach, S., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., Balvanera, P., González, D., Jacobs, S., Molnár, Z., Pascual, U. y Martín-López, B. (2020). Indicators for relational values of nature’s contributions to good quality of
life: The IPBES approach for Europe and Central Asia. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 50-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1703039
Spangenberg, J., Görg, C. y Settele, J. (2015). Stakeholder involvement in ESS research and governance: Between conceptual ambition and practical experiences – risks, challenges and tested tools. Ecosystem Services, 16, 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.006
Stępniewska, M., Grunewald, K., Villoslada, M. y Mizgajski, A. (2022). The various faces of transdisciplinarity in research on ecosystem services: Editorial to Special Issue. Ecosystem Services, 56, 101451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101451
Suich, H., Howe, C. y Mace, G. (2015). Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a review of the empirical links. Ecosystem Services, 12, 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.005
Umaña, P. (2017). Valoración sociocultural de la transformación territorial debido a la expansión forestal en la comuna de Pichilemu, Chile. [Tesis para optar al grado de Magíster en Gestión y Planificación Ambiental, Universidad de Chile].
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.